Self-fulfilling prophecies: why predatory publishing is here to stay
A guest post from Simon Linacre, whoc review five books on predatory publishing.
A guest post from Simon Linacre, whoc review five books on predatory publishing.
We looked at how many authors have published more than one paper in day in the first two months of 2025
Here is our description of a paper mill, in the context of scholarly publishing.
In the first ten months of 2024, 23 authors have published more than one article a day. We delve a little deeper.
A DOI is a permalink to a scientific paper. It says nothing about the quality of a publisher, a journal or a paper. In this article we look at what a DOI is and what it means for predatory publishing.
Here are five suggestions that we think will help stop unethical publishing. Do you agree?
We present a list of issues that the scholarly publishing faces and ask what we can do about it?
We are starting to look more robustly at journals and publishers. The article contains more details.
A paper was retracted as eight authors were added without the journal’s permission. We take a look at the profile of those eight authors.
We ask why somebody would publish more than one letter a day in scientific journals and what workflow this would entail.