ChatGPT Archives - Page 2 of 2 - Predatory Journals and Conferences

Ask ChatGPT if a journal is predatory Out of interest, we asked ChatGPT what advice it would give in order to identify a predatory journal. The exact question we asked was "How can I check if a journal is predatory?" We asked the question on 23 June 2023, using ChatGPT 3.5. The response we got is shown below. The response from ChatGPT when asked how to check if a journal is predatory To determine if a journal is predatory, you can consider the following steps: Research the Journal: Look for information about the journal's reputation, history, and editorial board. Search for their website and explore the content available. Examine the Journal's Website: Assess the overall appearance and functionality of the journal's website. Predatory journals often have poorly designed websites, numerous grammatical errors, and lack transparency in terms of contact information or journal policies. Review the Scope and Focus: Evaluate the journal's scope and the topics it claims to cover. Predatory journals may have an overly broad or unrelated scope, aiming to attract submissions from a wide range of subjects without specific expertise. Editorial Board: Check the composition of the editorial board. Look for well-known researchers or experts in the field. If the journal lists individuals without their consent or fails to provide adequate information about the board members, it may raise concerns. Publication Fees: Predatory journals are often profit-driven and may charge high publication fees without providing adequate services in return. Excessive fees combined with low-quality publishing practices can be indicative of a predatory journal. Peer Review Process: Investigate the journal's peer review process. Reputable journals have a rigorous peer review system to ensure the quality of published articles. Predatory journals may claim to have peer review but have a superficial or nonexistent review process. Indexing and Impact Factor: Check if the journal is indexed in reputable databases such as PubMed, Scopus, or Web of Science. Predatory journals often falsely claim indexing in well-known databases or mention irrelevant indexing services. Solicitation Emails: Be cautious if you receive unsolicited emails inviting you to submit your work to a journal you have never heard of. Predatory journals often use aggressive email campaigns to attract authors. Research the Journal's Reputation: Look for discussions or reviews about the journal from researchers in your field. Check reputable forums, social media groups, or online communities where academics share their experiences with journals. Consult Colleagues and Mentors: Seek advice from trusted colleagues, mentors, or faculty members who are familiar with publishing practices in your field. They may have valuable insights or recommendations regarding the journal you are evaluating. By following these steps, you can gather information and make an informed judgment about the legitimacy of a journal. It's crucial to be vigilant and conduct thorough research before submitting your work to any publication. Our Comments All this makes sense to us and it is good advice. An alternative is to look through the scientific literature and find the many checklists that have been published. In our view, the suggestions made by ChatGPT are pretty representative of many of the checklists that you will find.