Directory of Open Access Publishers release new criteria for special issues
The Directory of Open Access Journals has released its criteria for special issues. We comment on these.
The Directory of Open Access Journals has released its criteria for special issues. We comment on these.
To demonstrate that a journal is predatory sting operations have been carried out. A nonsense paper to see if it gets through the peer review and subsequently published.
In this article we look at a few papers that were submitted to test whether a journal is predatory, whether these were submitted but never made it to publication, or whether the paper was actually published.
We often get asked “How do I identify a predatory journal?” But, we can turn this on its head and ask “How can I identify a NON-predatory journal?” If this article we explore this.
We give a number of tips to enable you to avoid reviewing for a predatory journal.
In 2014 a journal accepted a paper that just repeated the phrase “Get me off your f*@^ing email list”. This article looks at the history of the paper, as well as the journal in question.
If you are new to Predatory Publishing, we suggest three Open Access articles that you might find useful as a gentle introduction.
MDPI have been accused of being a predatory publisher, but others have defended them. In this article we suggest a way forward.
About a year ago we saw an email that said a journal had 10 articles already, but needed another 20 more. We have a look at this request, now that a year has passed.
Some time ago we saw an email from a journal, seeking papers for Volume 1, Issue 1 of a new journal. In this article we look at how the journal has performed.
In this article we consider what data we should collect for publishers/journals, so that we can more easily compare one with another.