What does ChatGPT say about Predatory-Publishing.com?
We asked ChatGPT what it said about Predatory-Publishing.com. Here is what it said.
We asked ChatGPT what it said about Predatory-Publishing.com. Here is what it said.
Under the guise of an advent calendar, we have been listing the most highly cited papers that have addressed predatory publishing. Here we present the full list.
We look at which journals publish papers about Predatory Publishing and provide some high level analysis, including how much impact these articles are having.
TEQSA recently tweeted an A-Z of Predatory Publishing. We give our views on the “S is for Scope” entry.
We have previously look at some publishers but want to have a list of other publishers to look at. In this article, we suggest some, but would welcome other suggestions.
We discuss some of these issues and ask if there is an alternative way of classifying a predatory publisher/journal and, at least, start a discussion as to how these ideas could be developed.
In this article we consider what data we should collect for publishers/journals, so that we can more easily compare one with another.
On out Twitter feed we have looked at various publishers. Looking back, what reflections do we have?
In May 2020, Kyle Siler said that there is no agreed definition of predatory publishing.
Although this article was written almost two and a half years ago, is this still true today?
We have previously written about why scholars are willing to publish in predatory journals. These are our personal views.