Self-fulfilling prophecies: why predatory publishing is here to stay
A guest post from Simon Linacre, whoc review five books on predatory publishing.
A guest post from Simon Linacre, whoc review five books on predatory publishing.
A DOI is a permalink to a scientific paper. It says nothing about the quality of a publisher, a journal or a paper. In this article we look at what a DOI is and what it means for predatory publishing.
We present a list of issues that the scholarly publishing faces and ask what we can do about it?
We are starting to look more robustly at journals and publishers. The article contains more details.
The term predatory publishing (and its variants) should stop being used, along with trying to classify journals as being predatory, or not.
We mention three books, which all address predatory publishing.
We list the journals that have published the most papers on predatory publishing, along with the h-index of those articles
Michael J. I. Brown, Monash University For aficionados of bad science, the blog of University of Colorado librarian Jeffrey Beall
To demonstrate that a journal is predatory sting operations have been carried out. A nonsense paper to see if it gets through the peer review and subsequently published.
In this article we look at a few papers that were submitted to test whether a journal is predatory, whether these were submitted but never made it to publication, or whether the paper was actually published.
“Cyllage City COVID-19 Outbreak Linked to Zubat Consumption” is a spoof paper that was accepted and published in a peer reviewed journal. The paper even contained the sentence “Epidemiologists believe it highly likely that a journal publishing this paper does not practice peer review and must therefore be predatory”.