Verifying a Google Scholar impact factor?

Some journals, especially those which do not have a Scopus or an ISI Web of Science (aka Clarivates) impact factor, will often quote other impact factors. Some of these are not to be trusted but Google Scholar is a trusted name so if the journal quotes a Google Scholar impact factor, can we trust the data provided? The answer is proceed with caution.

For any impact factor, you should be able to verify (i.e. reproduce) it. With Google Scholar, this is possible but can be time consuming and it also requires a certain level of knowledge that many may not posses.

In this article, we look at how to use Google Scholar and how you would access the data to enable you to calculate an impact factor, so that you can verify statements made by a given journal. But first we look at the general issues of why other impact factors might not be everything they claim to be.

What is wrong with quoting other impact factors?

There is nothing wrong with journals using other impact factors but first let’s be clear what we mean by other.

In the context of this article, “other” means anything apart from Scopus or IS Web of Science (aka Clarivates). We specifically mention these two as they are the two that most journals want to be associated with. Some journals will even say they are indexed by these bibliographic indexes, even though they are not.

Let’s assume that the journals are being honest, as least with respect to not misrepresenting their association with Scopus and ISI. However they would still like to advertise some sort of impact factor, to give the impression that they are running a high quality journal and that the articles it publishes are being cited. And, indeed that might be the case but we should ask ourselves two questions.

  1. Is the impact factor that is being quoted an impact factor that you can have confidence in?
  2. Can you verify the value of the impact factor being stated?

To address these two issues, we make the following observations.

Some impact factors are just like predatory journals, in that they exist to provide an impact factor that the journal can use, without really have any strong basis for the value they quote. Even if they outline their process, some of it might be subjective so that reproducability is virtually impossible.

One of our previous articles , “When is ISI not ISI“, looked at one of these services that we believe gives the impression that a journal is indexed by ISI Web of Science when, in fact, this is not the case.

The other thing that you need to be able to do is to be able to verify the impact factor you are being quoted. This requires 1) you know where the data comes from and you can access it, importantly, in a way that does not rely on the journal just providing you with figures and 2) you need to know how to calculate the impact factor.

You will be surprised how often these two pieces of information are missing, in which case, you should question whether the impact factor is a valid measure.

Predatory impact factors (for want of a better phrase) is not something we have really focused, as part of blog or our Twitter account, but it is really an area that we should give more attention to, and we will look at more of these in future blogs. Let us know if there are any ones you would particularly like us to look at?

Why are we looking at Google Scholar?

We focus on Google Scholar as many journals/publishers state that they are indexed on Google Scholar and then state an impact factor that they have calculated. We would like to be able to verify that impact factor. Alternately, a journal may give an impact factor, with no information about where it has been derived from. In these cases it would be nice to know if this has been calculated from Google Scholar, by comparing our calculated figure with theirs.

It is understandable that journals want to associate themselves with Google Scholar. It is a trusted name on the internet and the Google Scholar service is free, so both journals/publishes and the research community (indeed the general public) can access all of this information free of charge.

One of the issues with Google Scholar is validating the impact factor that a journal presents you with. Let’s say that a journal says that it has a Google Scholar impact factor of 7.429, how do you know whether this is a valid figure, or something they have just made up, knowing that 7.429 will sound like an impressive number to most people, probably higher that what would be expected from Scopus and ISI’s Web of Science.

In general, you would expect a Google Scholar impact factor to be higher than Scopus/ISI as they will consider citations from a wider variety of sources that Scopus/ISI, so we should not be too worried about the magnitude of the number, but we should be able to verify it.

However, this is quite difficult on Google Scholar (unless anybody knows differently) as we discuss below.

Two ways a journal can be found on Google Scholar

There are two ways, that we are aware of, which enables a journal to have a Google Scholar presence.  One way is where the journal has set up a specific account. A second way is when the journal does not have an account, but you can still search for the journal using Google Scholar’s advanced search feature.

We look at both these options below.

When a journal has a Google Scholar account

In the same way that individual scholars can have a Google Scholar account, a journal can also register for an account. This makes it easy to find the journal and its publications.

To use as an example, we chose the journal “International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies“. This is a journal that we have previously tweeted about.

This journal has its own Google Scholar account, which you can see by following this link.

Figure 1 shows the account. You can see that the name of the journal appears at the top of the screen, where you would normally see the name of a scholar.

We have also showed the user name (this does not appear on the page, but we show it for information). If you know the username, you can go directly to their Google Scholar page using the URL:

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gcY_JeAAAAAJ

… you’ll see that that last part of the URL is the username.

When a journal does not have a Google Scholar account

Many journals have a Google Scholar account, but many do not; the majority in our experience, although we have no real data to support that statement – it is just our experience.

However, there is still a way that you can search for articles that a journal has published, even though it does not have Google Scholar account.

How to use Google Scholar Advanced Search

Figure 2: Google Scholar Advanced Search

Google Scholar has an advanced search function that enables you to look for articles published by a specific journal, even if that journal does not have an explicit Google Scholar account.

Figure 2 shows you how to use Google Scholar’s Advance Search functionality.

  1. If you go to the Google Scholar home page, at the top level is a drop down menu (see 1, in Figure 2).
  2. The drop down menu has an entry called “Advanced Search” (see 2, in Figure 2).
  3. Accessing the Advanced Search menu leads to the form shown in 3, in Figure 2. Simply enter the journal name in the “Return articles published in” field, and click on the search icon.
  4. This will return the articles that have been published by that journal (see 4, in Figure 3).

In the example in Figure 2, we have used the same journal (International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies) as before just to demonstrate how it works, but the journal does not need to have a Google Scholar account.

What can you Google Scholar tell you?

You can find out the papers a journal has published (according to Google Scholar) in at least two ways and the way you choose depends whether the journal has an explicit Google Scholar.

We have shown examples of these above.

Armed with these search results, what else can we find out?

The two things that many people are interested in are the h-index and the impact factor.

Google Scholar h-index

Figure 3: A Google Scholar h-index (accessed 07 Aug 2021)

For a journal (or person) that has a Google Scholar account, Google will automatically calculate the h-index of that journal or person. 

We are planning an article that goes into more details about the h-index, but you may want to look at the wikipedia entry in the meantime.

Essentially though, the h-index is “the maximum value of h such that the given author/journal has published at least h papers that have each been cited at least h times”.

If you look at Figure 3, it shows that the journal we looked at in Figure 1 has an h-index of 28.

This means that 28 papers have been cited 28 times or more. You will not be able to find 29 papers that have been cited 29 times, or more as that would give the journal an h-index of 29.

If a journal does not have a Google Scholar account, so you can only search for the journal as shown in Figure 2, the the h-index is not available through Google Scholar. You could calculate it manually by looking at every paper that the journal has published, seeing how many times it has been cited and then carrying out the necessary calculations. The idea behind this process is not that difficult but it will be time consuming if there are a large number of articles, unless you can automate it in some way – which we discuss below, when looking at the impact factor.

Google Scholar impact factor

The Google Scholar impact factor is often quoted by a journal, but is there a way that we can validate it? Unfortunately, the answer is no, at least not easily. The impact factor is not something that Google Scholar displays so we need another way of calculating it ourselves.

However, that is easier said that done. You really need to download all the data so that you can carry out the analysis, using a spreadsheet, or some other suitable tool. Downloading the data though is not easy, as Google Scholar does not provide this functionality (i.e. there is no export option), so you would have to rely on an external tool. Even those seem few and far between, but you may want to take a look at this link, which discusses this topic.

If you want/need to do it manually, you would need to copy/paste each paper, ensuring the collect the important information such the paper title, how many times it has been cited and the year it was published, as this information is important when calculating an impact factor.

Once you have the data, you then need to carry out the analysis. At this stage you still have key decisions to make, such as the number of years that the analysis will cover and the exact formula for the calculation. We will look at this in a later article.

Conclusion

We would like to leave you with better news, but calculating (or verifying) a Google Scholar impact factor is not easy. This is problematical as you may not want to verify the figure that is being provided by an external source, such as a journal that is quoting a specific impact factor.

We are currently developing a tool that enables us to do this. That is, if we provide a Google Scholar identifier, it will return various statistics, which will include the impact factor.

Google Scholar and the International Journal of Management (IAEME Publication)

The International Journal of Management (ISSN: 0976-6502), which is published by IAEME Publication has two Google Scholar entries. Each one shows a different number of publications, citations, h-index etc. In this article, we take a closer look as well as comparing against the journal’s own records, from its web site.

About IAEME Publication

IAEME claims to be one of the largest open access publishers, publishing more than 120 journals. It says that its journals are indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, Scope Database and jifactor. See figure 1 for further details (click to see a larger image).

Figure 1: About IAEME Publication (accessed 16 Jul 2021)

IAEME Publication is based in India. Figure 2 shows a map (click to see a larger image), along with their contact details. 

Figure2: Location of IAEME Publication (accessed 16 Jul 2021)

Concerns with IAEME

We admit to having some concerns with IAEME Publication and we are currently carrying out a deeper study, which goes beyond this Google Scholar analysis. Just to give you some idea of our other concerns, we mention three things.

The first is their review times. When we access their web page a pop up appears (see Figure 3). It states that the average review time is 3 days. This seems very short for a scientific journal?

Figure 3: Call for Paper Pup Up (accessed 16 Jul 2021)
Figure 4: The International Journal of Management is not longer indexed by Scopus (from this tweet)

Our second concern is that the publisher claims that some of their journals are indexed by Scopus. One of the journals we checked, and which is the the focus of this article (International Journal of Management), states that it is indexed by Scopus. We recently tweeted that the journal was making this claim, but it is not true, which can be verified by looking at the Scopus web site.

Our third concern is that IAEME Publication has blocked us on Twitter (see Figure 5). We are not really concerned about being blocked (it goes with the territory) but it shows us that they have taken some notice of what we have done (or doing) and the worry is, why are they worried.

We have offered them the right of reply but, at the time of writing, they have not responded to us.

Figure 5: IAEME has blocked us on Twitter (accesses 16 Jul 2021)

As we mentioned above, we have been tweeting about IAEME Publication. We hope that these have been fair, in that we present facts, rather than subjective observations, but feel free to judge that for yourself. Some of our tweets can be seen here.

We are currently carrying out a more in depth investigation of IAEME Publication and will present our findings in a future blog post.

International Journal of Management (IJM)

The focus of this article is the International Journal of Management (IJM), which is published by IAEME Publication. We will specifically look at their Google Scholar records, but there are other concerns about this journal, as we have mentioned on Twitter. For example:

  • A query about the calculation of the Google Scholar impact factor (see here)
  • Where do the other impact factors they mention come from? (see here)
  • The number of citations they are reporting, as opposed to the number given by Google Scholar (see here)
  • The fact they mention that they are indexed by Scopus when they are not (see here)

Journal of International Management Google Scholar Records​

While looking at IAEME Publication and the Journal of International Management it came to our attention that the journal has two different Google Scholar entries. We reported this in this tweet.

The two entries can be seen here (Google Scholar ID: FO7xZmsAAAAJ) and here (Google Scholar ID: G8kfJ-MAAAAJ).

At the time of writing, one of these profiles (FO7xZmsAAAAJ) had 3,468 citations and an h-index of 21 (see Figure 6) and the other (G8kfJ-MAAAAJ) had 4,737 citations and an h-index of 21 (see Figure 7).

Figures 6 and 7 showing the Google Scholar profile for FO7xZmsAAAAJ and G8kfJ-MAAAAJ, both of which are for the Journal of International Management (accessed 16 Jul 2021)

FO7xZmsAAAAJ

This was the first Google Scholar account we found for the International Journal of Management (see Figure 6). We took a closer look at the publications that were indexed (we did this by downloading the entries into a spreadsheet and analyzed them from there). Figure 8 shows the number of publications indexed by Google Scholar, split by year.

It is interesting to note the significant increase in published papers in the last two years, bearing in mind, at the time of writing, we are only just over half way through 2021.

Figure 8: Number of papers indexed on the Google Scholar account FO7xZmsAAAAJ

Figure 9 shows the number of citations, recorded by Google Scholar, for account FO7xZmsAAAAJ. The profile is a little surprising. You would expect to see citations increase year-on-year, as more papers are published that can be cited from. We have not done a detailed analysis of this but we wonder why the journal only attracted 22 (resp. 34) citations in 2018 (resp. 2019).

Figure 9: Number of citations to Journal of Management papers as indexed by Google Scholar account FO7xZmsAAAAJ

If we take the number of papers as 1,916 and the number of citations as 3,470, this would give an impact factor of (3470/1916)=1.81. This is higher than the 1.2 impact factor that the journal was reporting, or even the 0.98 that we previously calculated.

G8kfJ-MAAAAJ

This was the second Google Scholar account we found for the International Journal of Management (see Figure 7). We took a closer look at the publications that were indexed (again, by downloading the entries and analyzing using a spreadsheet). Figure 10 shows the number of publications indexed by Google Scholar, split by year.

We should note that we deleted 836 records from the papers listed in Google Scholar as they were duplicates (identified by the title). These are typically indicated on Google Scholar by the use of an asterix.

Figure 10: Number of citations to the Internatioanl Journal of Management as indexed by account papers indexed on the Google Scholar account

It is interesting to note that this account indexes more papers (2,140 vs 1,916), yet it does not (yet) index 2021 papers. It is reasonable to suppose that this would be around 500, taking the total to around 2,600

Figure 11: Number of citations to Journal of Management papers as indexed by Google Scholar account G8kfJ-MAAAAJ

Figure 11 shows the number of citations that the journal has attracted, as indexed by account G8kfJ-MAAAAJ. Similar to the other account, there is a dip in 2018 and 2019, but it is picking up in 2020.

If we take the number of papers as 2,140 and the number of citations as 5,319, this would give an impact factor of (5319/2140)=2.53. This is higher than the 1.2 impact factor that the journal was reporting, or even the 0.98 that we previously calculated.

Comparison with the journal's data

It is useful to also compare the Google Scholar data with the data as recorded by the journal, on their own web site.

We extracted the number of papers they had published each year and present this analysis in Figure 12.

Figure 12: Number of papers published by the International Journal of Management (Source: IJM web site, 17 Jul 2021)

We make the following observations on the data presented in Figure 12:

  • The number of published papers increased significantly in 2020. This year represents more than 50% of the papers they have published since the journal started in 2010.
  • What made 2020 such a high year was the large number of papers the journal published in issues 11 and 12, although there appeared to be a significant rise since issue 5. Figure 13, shows the breakdown, by issue, for 2020 (click image to enlarge it).
Figure 13: Number of papers published by the International Journal of Management in 2020
Figure 14: Number of papers published by the International Journal of Management in 2021
  • 2021 is already ahead of all the other years, with the exception of 2020. So far, volume 12 (i.e. 2021) has published 493 papers (see Figure 14). This is up to issue 7. Assuming they publish 12 issues, this could mean that they will publish about 850 papers this year. It is noticeable that the number of papers published in 2021 is decreasing, recognizing that issue 7 may not yet be complete.

Final Remarks

The purpose of this article was to raise the issue that a journal had two different Google Scholar accounts, which report different data. Moreover, neither Google Scholar account aligns with the data on the journal’s own web site. In our view, it would be useful if the journal editors consolidated their two Google Scholar accounts and also aligned that (single) account with the data held on the journal’s web site. If the editors could do this, it might actually benefit them as both Google Scholar accounts appear to under report what is shown on the journal’s web site.

Aside from the Google Scholar concerns, our recent tweets have asked other questions. As an example, some of the publisher’s journals were indexed by Scopus but this indexing was discontinued in 2020, apart from one journal as far as we could tell. We also asked, via Twitter, about areas such as impact factor calculations and, indeed, what impact factors are being used.

The journal has blocked us on Twitter. Rather than doing that, we would much rather enter into a dialogue and we have made the offer for them to write a blog post, to enable them to present their views. We hope that they take up this offer.