Beall’s papers indexed on Scopus

Written by Anonymous Author in Jeffrey Beall Last Updated September 12, 2023
One of Jeffrey Beall's papers

Here are the 11 publications (as at 11 Sep 2023) that Jeffrey Beall has written, as indexed by Scopus.

 

The list is sorted by the number of times the papers have been cited.

 

We note, that Beall has written a lot more papers (about 40) on predatory publishing but these are in journals not indexed by Scopus, so have not been included here.

 

  1. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012) Nature, 489 (7415), pp. 179, Cited 551 times. dx.doi.org/10.1038/489179a
  2. What I learned from predatory publishers (2017) Biochemia Medica, 27 (2), pp. 273 – 278, Cited 162 times. dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.20
  3. Medical Publishing Triage – Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013) Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2 (2), pp. 47 – 49, Cited 98 times. dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2049-
  4. Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access (2013) Learned Publishing, 26 (2), pp. 79 – 84, Cited 90 times. dx.doi.org/10.1087/201302
  5. Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research (2016) Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31 (10), pp. 1511 – 1513, Cited 82 times. dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2
  6. The open-access movement is not really about open access (2013) TripleC, 11 (2), pp. 589 – 597, Cited 54 times. dx.doi.org/10.31269/vol11
  7. Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures (2015) Information Development, 31 (5), pp. 473 – 476, Cited 39 times. dx.doi.org/10.1177/026666
  8. Unethical practices in scholarly, open-access publishing (2013) Journal of Information Ethics, 22 (1), pp. 11 – 20, Cited 12 times. dx.doi.org/10.3172/JIE.22

    [Note: This DOI (10.3172/JIE.22.1.11) does not appear to work (it leads to a “metapress page”) and we are struggling to locate this paper. If you can help with a correct link, please let us know]

  9. Predatory publishing: Overzealous open-access advocates are creating an exploitative environment, threatening the credibility of scholarly publishing (2012) Scientist, 26 (8), Cited 9 times. the-scientist.com/critic-at-larg
  10. Predatory publishers: Implications for pharmacy practice and practitioners (2017) Canadian Pharmacists Journal, 150 (5), pp. 274 – 275, Cited 7 times. dx.doi.org/10.1177/171516
  11. Behind the Spam: A Spectral Analysis of Predatory Publishers (2015) Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 11 (A29A), pp. 166 – 171, Cited 2 times. dx.doi.org/10.1017/S17439

Recent Posts