Stop classifying journals as predatory
The term predatory publishing (and its variants) should stop being used, along with trying to classify journals as being predatory, or not.
The term predatory publishing (and its variants) should stop being used, along with trying to classify journals as being predatory, or not.
“With help from drug companies, Omics International is making millions as it roils the scientific community with sketchy publications.” You need to read this article.
We looked at Scopus and accessed all the papers that have been written by Jeffrey Beall.
Michael J. I. Brown, Monash University For aficionados of bad science, the blog of University of Colorado librarian Jeffrey Beall
To demonstrate that a journal is predatory sting operations have been carried out. A nonsense paper to see if it gets through the peer review and subsequently published.
In this article we look at a few papers that were submitted to test whether a journal is predatory, whether these were submitted but never made it to publication, or whether the paper was actually published.
In 2014 a journal accepted a paper that just repeated the phrase “Get me off your f*@^ing email list”. This article looks at the history of the paper, as well as the journal in question.
If you are new to Predatory Publishing, we suggest three Open Access articles that you might find useful as a gentle introduction.
We outline a new direction for this web site (and our Twitter feed). We will still focus on predatory publishing but will also have a much wider coverage.
In 2021, Scientometrics published a paper and later retracted it. The retraction was made due to pressure exerted by the publisher Frontiers. The paper was eventually published in another journal.
One of the solutions to our first Only Connect wall was four papers by Jeffrey Beall. In this article, we provide more details.