Get me off Your F*@^ing Mailing List
In 2014 a journal accepted a paper that just repeated the phrase “Get me off your f*@^ing email list”. This article looks at the history of the paper, as well as the journal in question.
In 2014 a journal accepted a paper that just repeated the phrase “Get me off your f*@^ing email list”. This article looks at the history of the paper, as well as the journal in question.
In 2020, the “World Academy of Science and Engineering and Technology” (WASET) is promoting 142,791 conferences. In this article we analyze these conferences and also estimate the revenue that they generate.
If you are new to Predatory Publishing, we suggest three Open Access articles that you might find useful as a gentle introduction.
We look at how many special issues MDPI publishes, noting that the number has risen significantly in 2023.
We outline a new direction for this web site (and our Twitter feed). We will still focus on predatory publishing but will also have a much wider coverage.
Frontiers recently retracted two papers and they should be applauded for that. But in light of these retractions, what should happen next. We make a suggestion.
In 2021, Scientometrics published a paper and later retracted it. The retraction was made due to pressure exerted by the publisher Frontiers. The paper was eventually published in another journal.
MDPI have been accused of being a predatory publisher, but others have defended them. In this article we suggest a way forward.
Generators, such as ChapGPT, cannot be listed as authors on a paper, yet this is happening and (in some cases) it is easy to spot.
MDPI have had their flagship journal delisted from Clarivate’s Web of Science. Is the reason due to the rapid increase in the number of papers it publishes. We look at the journal that was delisted.